One of the current challenges to understanding neural information processing in biological systems is to decipher the "code" carried by large populations of neurons acting in parallel. We present an algorithm for automated discovery of stochastic firing patterns in large ensembles of neurons. The algorithm, from the "Helmholtz Machine" family, attempts to predict the observed spike patterns in the data. The model consists of an observable layer which is directly activated by the input spike patterns, and hidden units that are activated through ascending connections from the input layer. The hidden unit activity can be propagated down to the observable layer to create a prediction of the data pattern that produced it.

One of the current challenges to understanding neural information processing in biological systems is to decipher the "code" carried by large populations of neurons acting in parallel. We present an algorithm for automated discovery of stochastic firing patterns in large ensembles of neurons. The algorithm, from the "Helmholtz Machine" family, attempts to predict the observed spike patterns in the data. The model consists of an observable layer which is directly activated by the input spike patterns, and hidden units that are activated through ascending connections from the input layer. The hidden unit activity can be propagated down to the observable layer to create a prediction of the data pattern that produced it.

One of the current challenges to understanding neural information processing in biological systems is to decipher the "code" carried by large populations of neurons acting in parallel. We present an algorithm for automated discovery of stochastic firing patterns in large ensembles of neurons. The algorithm, from the "Helmholtz Machine" family, attempts to predict the observed spike patterns in the data. The model consists of an observable layer which is directly activated by the input spike patterns, and hidden units that are activated throughascending connections from the input layer. The hidden unit activity can be propagated down to the observable layer to create a prediction of the data pattern that produced it.

Hidden units in multi-layer networks form a representation space in which each region can be identified with a class of equivalent outputs (Elman, 1989) or a logical state in a finite state machine (Cleeremans, Servan-Schreiber & McClelland, 1989; Giles, Sun, Chen, Lee, & Chen, 1990). We extend the analysis of the spatial structure of hidden unit space to a combinatorial task, based on binding features together in a visual scene. The logical structure requires a combinatorial number of states to represent all valid scenes. On analysing our networks, we find that the high dimensionality of hidden unit space is exploited by using the intersection of neighboring regions to represent conjunctions of features. These results show how combinatorial structure can be based on the spatial nature of networks, and not just on their emulation of logical structure.

Hidden units in multi-layer networks form a representation space in which each region can be identified with a class of equivalent outputs (Elman, 1989) or a logical state in a finite state machine (Cleeremans, Servan-Schreiber & McClelland, 1989; Giles, Sun, Chen, Lee, & Chen, 1990). We extend the analysis of the spatial structure of hidden unit space to a combinatorial task, based on binding features together in a visual scene. The logical structure requires a combinatorial number of states to represent all valid scenes. On analysing our networks, we find that the high dimensionality of hidden unit space is exploited by using the intersection of neighboring regions to represent conjunctions of features. These results show how combinatorial structure can be based on the spatial nature of networks, and not just on their emulation of logical structure.

These results show how combinatorial structure can be based on the spatial nature of networks, and not just on their emulation of logical structure.

We present a framework for programming tbe bidden unit representations of simple recurrent networks based on the use of hint units (additional targets at the output layer). We present two ways of analysing a network trained within this framework: Input patterns act as operators on the information encoded by the context units; symmetrically, patterns of activation over tbe context units act as curried functions of the input sequences. Simulations demonstrate that a network can learn to represent three different functions simultaneously and canonical discriminant analysis is used to investigate bow operators and curried functions are represented in the space of bidden unit activations.

We present a framework for programming tbe bidden unit representations of simple recurrent networks based on the use of hint units (additional targets at the output layer). We present two ways of analysing a network trained within this framework: Input patterns act as operators on the information encoded by the context units; symmetrically, patterns of activation over tbe context units act as curried functions of the input sequences. Simulations demonstrate that a network can learn to represent three different functions simultaneously and canonical discriminant analysis is used to investigate bow operators and curried functions are represented in the space of bidden unit activations.

We present a framework for programming tbe bidden unit representations of simple recurrent networks based on the use of hint units (additional targets at the output layer). We present two ways of analysing a network trained within this framework: Input patterns act as operators on the information encoded by the context units; symmetrically, patterns of activation over tbe context units act as curried functions of the input sequences. Simulations demonstrate that a network can learn to represent three different functions simultaneously and canonical discriminant analysis is used to investigate bow operators and curried functions are represented in the space of bidden unit activations.